<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>colpacbuildingtrades.com Current Articles Feed</title><link>http://colpacbuildingtrades.com</link><description>Current Articles From colpacbuildingtrades.com</description><language>en-us</language><ttl>300</ttl><item><title>Endorsements</title><pubDate></pubDate><description><![CDATA[.]]></description><link>http://colpacbuildingtrades.com/index.cfm?zone=/unionactive/view_article.cfm&amp;homeID=103763</link></item><item><title>First Annual Union Solidarity Day</title><pubDate></pubDate><description><![CDATA[.]]></description><link>http://colpacbuildingtrades.com/index.cfm?zone=/unionactive/view_article.cfm&amp;homeID=60849</link></item><item><title>Carpenter&apos;s Strike</title><pubDate></pubDate><description><![CDATA[Many of you have called me wondering if this Council has taken a stance on the current Carpenters strike.  The Carpenters have never asked that this Council to sanction their strike.  Therefore, it is not a Building Trades sanctioned strike. Even though the Carpenters do not belong to the Building Trades, I&#x92;m sure we would have sanctioned their strike if it were about wages and benefits only.]]></description><link>http://colpacbuildingtrades.com/index.cfm?zone=/unionactive/view_article.cfm&amp;homeID=60846</link></item><item><title>Welcome to the new site!</title><pubDate></pubDate><description><![CDATA[Many of you have called me wondering if this Council has taken a stance on the current Carpenters strike.  The Carpenters have never asked that this Council to sanction their strike.  Therefore, it is not a Building Trades sanctioned strike. Even though the Carpenters do not belong to the Building Trades, I&#x92;m sure we would have sanctioned their strike if it were about wages and benefits only.]]></description><link>http://colpacbuildingtrades.com/index.cfm?zone=/unionactive/view_article.cfm&amp;homeID=42034</link></item></channel></rss> 
